Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Collette Greystone's avatar

Didn’t figure you for a prepper! You could add - join the local militia - if you wanted to be hardcore. 😎

Philthy's avatar

Always a good read and I agree with most of it except for where the idealistic beliefs originate.

"We all have idealistic beliefs about how the world works, or at least how it should work."

Idealistically, our idealistic beliefs come from within ourselves. Unfortunately, it's not the government feeding those ideals, it's the algorithms in social media reshaping and nurturing our ideals.

The far majority of people surround themselves with people that mirror their own ideals. They are the easiest to get along with, they reaffirm our beliefs, and generally we have a good time with them doing things enjoyable by everyone. All of those people are also in the same bag with you. They are being fed the same social feeds. All of them getting the same news. News that agrees with your ideals. Your friends, and most of your family reaffirm those ideas.

Social media is making bank off of the conflict between political classes because for the first time, they can selectively advertise down to the individual. News papers and televised news used to be fairly consistent giving both sides of the argument. They had to, they wanted viewership. Now that's all changed in the realization that conflict lengthens engagement on platform. Clickbait titles such as, "Social media erupts over bla, bla, bla" or "Congressmen bla goes viral for his post against bla, bla, bla" draw readers in. They farm those views/subscriptions for advertising revenue. The only way for a politician to get visibility through the noise is by coming up with something more spectacular and controversial than the last guy. Ever post something on social media, something really good, and wonder why you don't get any thumbs up? It's like nobody gets it? Because they didn't get it - physically, they never got it. Understand that your post could suppressed without your knowledge. You're post doesn't create the conflict/engagement their looking for. They want the wacko's and since your post makes sense and calms the argument, it's suppressed. You're not helping generate revenue.

Look at The View, Groyper Army, The Squad, The MAGA Squad. Their ridiculous, petty, and mostly fail their constitutions constantly. They deliver nothing but negativity and they're making bank off of it.

Here's a great point considering Warsh's confirmation hearing today. Something over 20 senators asking questions, many of them pretty good and thoughtful. Then, Elizabeth Warren grandstands her time going lit over his personal wealth and tying it into money laundering, China, and Epstein. It wasn't a series of questions concerning his values, convictions, credo, or ideology. There wasn't a single question during her time of any depth and any question he tried to answer she cut him off. Yet, there she was, being posted all over the Internet for lambasting Warsh. Nobody else got screen time. That's how it works. We're only seeing the bad side of politics now because the conflict lengthens engagement. It's become nearly impossible to weed through the garbage to figure out what the real issues are and each side is so dead set against each other because they are watching selectively different feeds of the same story aligned to their own values. We believe the other side is crazy not to see it our way.

Because they never have.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?