Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patsy's avatar

To store & grow purchasing power?

What happens when the "value" of a Bitcoin drops from its lofty perch to half its present value?

Seems to me that Bitcoin isn't money (currency), nor an investment, but rather a speculative gamble...

Bitcoin appears to have trouble sustaining/ maintaining a consistant value. From what I gather, the majority of Bitcoins are owned by "whales" who continually manipulate/ move the "market" by buying UP the price, then selling -- causing a crash they can profit from... which they have done, repeatedly!

I want to share your enthusiasm, Bag. But I just can't help from thinking the whole crypto-game is one big ponzie scheme. It sure doesn't seem like an investment to me. Do you think it makes sense to sell 31 or 32 gold coins to buy a $67K digital notation speculation?

The blockchain process of transacting and moving money around the world, at minimal cost, out of the reach of governments, is certainly something of Value! But that is just a better accounting/ transfering system. When buying Bitcoin, what we are doing is transferring our excess earnings (savings) of say, $60,000 on Monday... What is it that Bitcoin did, to make it worth $67,000 on Thursday? Or worse, $55,000 on Friday? Clearly, I am missing something.

Looks like tulips to me.

Expand full comment
View from far away's avatar

A bit late to this, but I will take exception to:

> Bitcoin has one, with NO possible competition.

What about the other 10,000 cryptocurrencies? :)

Seriously, as open source, anyone can create in identically-functioning clone (you only need to convince people to use it).

In my view, Bitcoin will end up as most of the past monopolies you listed - completely overtaken by more technologically advanced alternatives (faster, cheaper, more private).

I have listed the reasons why Bitcoin can't survive in its current form in a number of comments to the post where I found the link to this article (I won't repeat my reasoning here, but if you want to challenge my assertion, you might want to review them):

https://quoththeraven.substack.com/p/bitcoin-redundancy-realizations

Basically Bitcoin has limited use cases with transactions slow and expensive. The developers have attempted to get around that by blowing up the entire Bitcoin ethos (peer-to-peer transactions without any intermediaries) by adding a second layer where sending value goes through one or more intermediaries (each of which rakes off a fee).

While Bitcoin averages a new block every 10 minutes (with random intervals between them - once every couple of weeks the time between blocks exceeds an hour), alternatives has much faster (and regular) intervals between blocks (Ethereum 12 seconds, Tron 3 seconds, Solana 400 milliseconds).

Ethereum definitely looks like a long-term winner. This year, the network will transfer over 15 TRILLION dollars worth of stablecoin payments. Most of DeFi runs on Ethereum. Most NFTs exist on Ethereum.

Bitcoin does have the "first-mover" advantage, but (again, like most of the companies listed in your post) it won't last due to the difficulty of making improvements to the protocol (the validators, or "miners," won't accept anything that harms their interest, even if it benefits the ecosystem as a whole).

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts